Showing posts with label #aplangchat. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #aplangchat. Show all posts
Monday, April 24, 2017
Counting down to the Exam!
It is time for the annual student-teacher #aplangchat. We invite your students to join the chat and ask questions about the exam. This is a opportunity for students to ask questions of AP Language teachers from around the country. Several of these teachers read the exam.
We invite you to join the chat and contribute by answering student questions. The power of this chat comes from many AP Lang teachers sharing their approaches to the test and answering student questions.
I love this chat. It gives my students the chance to interact with other teachers who reinforce what I have taught. Sometimes another teacher can phrase an idea that resonates with my students in a way I haven't expressed. Other times, teachers say exactly what I have taught all year, but this time the many teacher voices drive the point home with my students. Finally, I use it as a way to judge what students are thinking about the exam. I often cull ideas that I need to reinforce with my classes. Not all my students can chat that night and I bring the conversation back to my classroom.
Before the chat please review some twitter etiquette with your students:
1) Have students label their answers to the questions as A1, A2, A3, A4, etc.
2) Remind students to be courteous to others.
3) Have students include #aplangchat on all tweets so everyone can see them in the chat.
If you use a personal twitter handle that you do not want your students to access, you may consider creating a handle for this chat.
We look forward to having you and your students join the conversation at 8 p.m. EST Wednesday, April 26th. If you miss the chat, you can always search the #aplangchat hashtag to see what you missed.
Saturday, March 11, 2017
Collect, Debate, and Synthesize Evidence using Non-Fiction Book Clubs
The process:
Some of the topics students have
featured in past clubs:
Language and Writing, Education, The
Internet and Social Relations, Crime, Mental Illness, Disasters, Political
Philosophy, Psychology, Communication, Ethics, Science, Technology, etc.
In addition, pull non-fiction books
from the shelves of your library and have students speed date the books in order
to find a topic of interest for the the project.
3) Read the book in three-four weeks.
4) Collect significant quotes for
argument essay evidence on Scholar Cards[1]
5) Meet weekly in book clubs. Students
share quotes, issues, or ideas from reading.
6) Prepare a seminar on the topic after the books
are read.
Student seminar preparation includes:
Student seminar preparation includes:
a. Finding an article, Ted Talk, or excerpt(s) from
books to assign to the class.
b. Writing brief summaries of the arguments and
ideas for the books read.
c. Constructing thoughtful seminar questions that
address key ideas and arguments.
d. Assigning roles to group members: seminar leader, question leaders,
& scribe.
The scribe summarizes the ideas from the discussion on a shared google doc.
The scribe summarizes the ideas from the discussion on a shared google doc.
7) Conduct the class seminar on the topic and
upload the summary to the shared google doc.
Students have paired Ghettoside with In Cold Blood, focused on introverts in a Quiet group, and considered various education issues in The Overachievers, I am Malala, and Waiting for Superman. Students use the
ideas as evidence in their argument essays and it increases their
bank of information for the exam. Many students
come back from the exam stating that their book club discussion made good evidence
to support their arguments. With time
running close to the exam, this can be modified to a Non-fiction Article/Ted
Talk Club. I am curious to know what
book or article pairings you have used in your classroom. Please add your pairings or a non-fiction selfie to the comments below.
[1] Scholar Pack strategy attributed to Dan Sharkovitz at Martha’s Vineyard Regional High School. Student sample cached at www.mvrhs.org/englishdept/shark/Powerpoints/Phoebe%20scholar%20pack%20.ppt
Wednesday, February 1, 2017
Players, Game & Response: Expanding Perspectives for Synthesis
We often discuss having students enter a conversation with
the sources when they write a synthesis essay.
This activity helps students think creatively about a source in order to
determine multiple perspectives on an issue and enter the conversation as
various stakeholders. It can also be
used with current events to build a repertoire of evidence to draw from on the
exam. I start by modeling the activity
with an article I select and then have students bring in an article or
editorial on a topic of choice. The
activity is as follows:
Step 1: Select an
article on a topic of choice. I used an
article from my local newspaper about air quality issues.
Step 2: Have students read the article and mark the
following:
a)
Highlight the issues discussed in the article in
pink.
b)
Highlight who cares about the issue in blue (These are the players
in the game or the stakeholders interested in the issue.) On the side of the article, have students
list people or entities that are not named in the article that also have an
interest.
c)
Highlight what they think in yellow. Students also give positions for the
people or entities that they added in the margin.
In the Players column, students list five stakeholders (people or groups
with concerns about the issue). These
players can be named in the article or be those people or entities not named in
the article that would have an interest in the issue. Students should choose players that have a
variety of perspectives on the issue. In
the “American Lung Association ranks SLC in top 10 for worst air quality”
article, players listed in the article are the Sierra Club (Shane Levy), the
American Lung Association (Paul Billings), Utah Physicians for a Healthy
Environment (Brian Moench), and Utah’s Department of Environmental Quality
(Alan Matheson). Players not listed in
the article are Utah residents who suffer from bad air quality, parents,
business owners, automobile drivers, Utah Transit Authority, Utah Legislature,
City Council members, etc.
In the Game column, students describe each stakeholder’s position either
from the article or from what students know about this person or group. For example, students listed that the
legislature wants to encourage business development with fewer regulations, but
they also want protect the health of Utah Residents. Students felt business and industry would be
against stricter emission controls since these regulations would cut
profits.
In the Response column, students pair with another student and discuss the
stakeholder’s position. Students decide
whether they agree, disagree or qualify the argument and provide reasons to
support their perspective.
Have students share their thinking
with the class. Creativity in naming players adds depth to the issue and makes
for a lively discussion.
Step 4: Have students select their own article to use
with this activity.
Students like using this activity as a preparation for
research, for it helps them brainstorm key terms for research. I like using this to train students to
interact with the sources they read. In addition, I will often assign articles
from different perspectives for a seminar on an issue. This activity helps students interact with
their source so they are prepared for discussion.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


